Skip to main content

LIST OF REPORTED AND UNREPORTED CASES: MLJ

 YONG KOK YEAP & ANOR v URUSWAJAR CONCRETE SDN BHD [2026] MLJU 673

 

THEYAKARAJA A/L PALANIANDY v MAJLIS PEGUAM & ANOR [2024] MLJU 1470

 

LIM MEI JIN (SUING AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF LOH YUEN WENG (DECEASED) (APPOINTED AS THE EXECUTRIX AND TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF LOH YUEN WENG (DECEASED)) & ANOR v LOH YUEN TUCK [2025] MLJU 478

 

SHRI @ INDRAN RAM A/L RAMASAMY v MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA [2022] MLJU 3019

 

KIM LAM HUAT BUILDERS SDN BHD v ANG KUAH CHUA DAN SATU LAGI [2021] MLJU 210

 

SHIKOH ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD v URUSWAJAR CONCRETE SDN BHD [2019] MLJU 1723

 

LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN RAZAK & ANOR AND ANOTHER APPEAL [2018] 1 MLJ 503

 

LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN ABDUL RAZAK [2017] MLJU 1330

 

TRIP GUARD SDN BHD v IMMANUEL CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD [2017] MLJU 1138


LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN RAZAK DAN SATU LAGI [2016] MLJU 1907

 

SYARIKAT BEKALAN AIR SELANGOR SDN BHD v FADHA NUR BT AHMAD KAMAR & ANOR [2012] 7 MLJ 657 | [2011] MLJU 536

 

DATO SOO LAI SING v KUMPULAN SIERRAMAS (M) SDN BHD [2004] 3 MLJ 546

 

FACB BERHAD v HO SEE SIN & OTHERS [2003] MLJU 450

 

TRANSTEL TECHNOLOGY (M) SDN BHD v NATSEVEN TV SDN BHD [2003] MLJU 238

 

AZRAHI HOTELS SDN BHD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIRTUAL AMBER SDN BHD); ADVANCE HOTELS SUPPLIES (M) SDN BHD & ANOR, SUPPORTING CREDITORS v AZRAHI HOTELS SDN BHD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIRTUAL AMBER SDN BHD); ADVANCE HOTELS SUPPLIES (M) SDN BHD & ANOR, SUPPORTING CREDITORS [2003] 5 MLJ 503

 

CELCOM (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD v INMISS COMMUNICATION SDN. BHD. [2003] MLJ 178

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN BHD v BELL & ORDER BHD [2002] 3 MLJ 321

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [2002] 2 MLJ 506

 

AJE BEST-ON SDN BHD v AHMAD BIN OMAR & ANOR [2000] 4 MLJ 600

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN BHD v BELL & ORDER BHD [2000] 6 MLJ 385

 

ANN JOO METAL SDN BHD v PEMBENAAN MY CHAHAYA SDN BHD [2000] 5 MLJ 708

 

DMCD MUSEUMN ASSOCIATES SDN. BHD. v SHADEMAKER (M) SDN. BHD. [1998] MLJU 364

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [1999] 6 MLJ 112

 

LAI SING KEJURUTERAAN (M) SDN BHD v TEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD [1997] MLJU 197

Popular posts from this blog

Probate & Administration; Tort; Civil Procedure: Case Updates

In Ong Thye Peng v Loo Choo Teng & 7 Ors [2008] 1 AMR 757 [FC], Section 60 of the Probate and Administration Act 1959 (“the Act”) addresses the disposal of a deceased person’s property by their personal representative. Both executors and administrators serve as trustees of the beneficiaries’ property, bearing the responsibility to ensure the estate benefits to the greatest extent possible when dealing with trust assets. Their primary duty is to safeguard the rights and interests of the beneficiaries, and as such, the obligations of executors and administrators in relation to the estate are identical, particularly in the context of selling estate property. Consequently, in the sale of property by an executor, the fair market value is to be assessed not at the time of the offer but at the date of the hearing for the application seeking approval of the proposed sale. In the case of The Co-operative Central Bank Limited v KGV & Associates Sdn Bhd [2008] 1 AMR 789 [FC], the court ...
Read more

What are the available remedies to a purchaser when he is given a defective house out of time by the seller developer?

Late Delivery and Defective Housing: Your Legal Remedies as a Malaysian Homebuyer Buying a home is one of the most significant financial investments you will ever make in Malaysia. It can be incredibly frustrating when a housing developer delivers your property late, only for you to find it riddled with construction defects. If you are facing this situation, you have clear legal protections under Malaysian law. Here is a breakdown of the remedies available to Malaysian homebuyers when a developer delivers a defective house past the agreed deadline. 1. Compensation for Construction Defects When a developer delivers a house with defects (such as cracked walls, leaking pipes, or poor workmanship), they are legally obligated to fix them or compensate you under the standard Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) prescribed by the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA) . In the landmark case of LSSC Development Sdn Bhd v Thomas Iruthayam & Anor [2007] , the Court of Appeal...
Read more

Civil Procedure (pleadings-amendments; injunctions against Danaharta): Case Updates

In the case of Wu Siew Ying (trading as Fuh Lin Bud-Grafting Centre) v Gunung Tunggal Quarry & Construction Sdn Bhd & 2 Others [2008] 1 AMR 496 [Court of Appeal], the established legal principle affirms that amendments to pleadings may be permitted at any stage of the proceedings, provided they occur before the pronouncement of the court’s decision. As such, it was within the bounds of the law for the third defendant to seek an amendment at this advanced stage, even subsequent to the completion of submissions by all parties involved. This reflects the judiciary’s recognition of procedural flexibility when it does not prejudice the fair conduct of the case. Dato' Seri Dr Kok Mew Soon & 3 Ors v Mustapha bin Mohamed & 2 Ors [2008] 1 AMR 537 [HC] Under Section 72(a) of the Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad Act 1998, supported by relevant legal authorities, the court is expressly barred from issuing an injunction order against Danaharta as a corporate entity. In the...
Read more