Skip to main content

LIST OF REPORTED AND UNREPORTED CASES: AMR

 Yong Kok Yeap & Anor v Uruswajar Concrete Sdn Bhd [2026] AMEJ 0472


THEYAKARAJA A/L PALANIANDY v MAJLIS PEGUAM [2024] AMEJ 1406

 

LIM MEI JIN v LOH YUEN TUCK [2025] AMEJ 0399

 

SHRI @ INDRAN RAM A/L RAMASAMY v MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA [2022] AMEJ 1722

 

LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN ABDUL RAZAK & ANOR [2017] AMEJ 1059

 

TRIP GUARD SDN BHD v IMMANUEL CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD [2017] AMEJ 1201

 

ZINCO MANUFACTURING SDN BHD v SIN YEAP HOLDINGS (M) SDN BHD (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI SIN YEAP TIMBER MOULDING SDN BHD) [2009] AMEJ 0026

 

KTL SDN BHD v AZRAHI HOTELS SDN BHD [2003] AMEJ 0158

 

CELCOM (MALAYSIA) BERHAD v INMISS COMMUNICATION SDN BHD [2003] AMEJ 0178

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN BHD v BELL & ORDER BERHAD (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI BELL & ORDER SDN BHD) [2002] AMEJ 0079


MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [2002] AMEJ 0014

 

AJE BEST-ON SDN BHD v YB AHMAD BIN OMAR @ AMAR [2000] AMEJ 0343

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN. BHD v BELL & ORDER BERHAD [2016] AMEJ 0540

 

ANN JOO METAL SDN BHD v PEMBENAAN MY CAHAYA SDN BHD [1999] AMEJ 0164

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU (NO 2) [1999] 1 AMR 49

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [1998] 3 AMR 2501

Popular posts from this blog

Probate & Administration; Tort; Civil Procedure: Case Updates

In Ong Thye Peng v Loo Choo Teng & 7 Ors [2008] 1 AMR 757 [FC], Section 60 of the Probate and Administration Act 1959 (“the Act”) addresses the disposal of a deceased person’s property by their personal representative. Both executors and administrators serve as trustees of the beneficiaries’ property, bearing the responsibility to ensure the estate benefits to the greatest extent possible when dealing with trust assets. Their primary duty is to safeguard the rights and interests of the beneficiaries, and as such, the obligations of executors and administrators in relation to the estate are identical, particularly in the context of selling estate property. Consequently, in the sale of property by an executor, the fair market value is to be assessed not at the time of the offer but at the date of the hearing for the application seeking approval of the proposed sale. In the case of The Co-operative Central Bank Limited v KGV & Associates Sdn Bhd [2008] 1 AMR 789 [FC], the court ...
Read more

What are the available remedies to a purchaser when he is given a defective house out of time by the seller developer?

Late Delivery and Defective Housing: Your Legal Remedies as a Malaysian Homebuyer Buying a home is one of the most significant financial investments you will ever make in Malaysia. It can be incredibly frustrating when a housing developer delivers your property late, only for you to find it riddled with construction defects. If you are facing this situation, you have clear legal protections under Malaysian law. Here is a breakdown of the remedies available to Malaysian homebuyers when a developer delivers a defective house past the agreed deadline. 1. Compensation for Construction Defects When a developer delivers a house with defects (such as cracked walls, leaking pipes, or poor workmanship), they are legally obligated to fix them or compensate you under the standard Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) prescribed by the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA) . In the landmark case of LSSC Development Sdn Bhd v Thomas Iruthayam & Anor [2007] , the Court of Appeal...
Read more

Civil Procedure (pleadings-amendments; injunctions against Danaharta): Case Updates

In the case of Wu Siew Ying (trading as Fuh Lin Bud-Grafting Centre) v Gunung Tunggal Quarry & Construction Sdn Bhd & 2 Others [2008] 1 AMR 496 [Court of Appeal], the established legal principle affirms that amendments to pleadings may be permitted at any stage of the proceedings, provided they occur before the pronouncement of the court’s decision. As such, it was within the bounds of the law for the third defendant to seek an amendment at this advanced stage, even subsequent to the completion of submissions by all parties involved. This reflects the judiciary’s recognition of procedural flexibility when it does not prejudice the fair conduct of the case. Dato' Seri Dr Kok Mew Soon & 3 Ors v Mustapha bin Mohamed & 2 Ors [2008] 1 AMR 537 [HC] Under Section 72(a) of the Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad Act 1998, supported by relevant legal authorities, the court is expressly barred from issuing an injunction order against Danaharta as a corporate entity. In the...
Read more