Skip to main content

LIST OF REPORTED AND UNREPORTED CASES IN THE ALL-MALAYSIA REPORTS ("AMR")



Yong Kok Yeap & Anor v Uruswajar Concrete Sdn Bhd [2026] AMEJ 0472


THEYAKARAJA A/L PALANIANDY v MAJLIS PEGUAM [2024] AMEJ 1406

 

LIM MEI JIN v LOH YUEN TUCK [2025] AMEJ 0399

 

SHRI @ INDRAN RAM A/L RAMASAMY v MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA [2022] AMEJ 1722

 

LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN ABDUL RAZAK & ANOR [2017] AMEJ 1059

 

TRIP GUARD SDN BHD v IMMANUEL CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD [2017] AMEJ 1201

 

ZINCO MANUFACTURING SDN BHD v SIN YEAP HOLDINGS (M) SDN BHD (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI SIN YEAP TIMBER MOULDING SDN BHD) [2009] AMEJ 0026

 

KTL SDN BHD v AZRAHI HOTELS SDN BHD [2003] AMEJ 0158

 

CELCOM (MALAYSIA) BERHAD v INMISS COMMUNICATION SDN BHD [2003] AMEJ 0178

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN BHD v BELL & ORDER BERHAD (DAHULUNYA DIKENALI SEBAGAI BELL & ORDER SDN BHD) [2002] AMEJ 0079


MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [2002] AMEJ 0014

 

AJE BEST-ON SDN BHD v YB AHMAD BIN OMAR @ AMAR [2000] AMEJ 0343

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN. BHD v BELL & ORDER BERHAD [2016] AMEJ 0540

 

ANN JOO METAL SDN BHD v PEMBENAAN MY CAHAYA SDN BHD [1999] AMEJ 0164

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU (NO 2) [1999] 1 AMR 49

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [1998] 3 AMR 2501

Popular posts from this blog

CRIMINAL LAW: After having found prosecution has established a prima facie case, trial Judge has to call accused to enter his defence

Legal Update: Why Malaysian Courts Cannot Evaluate the Insanity Defense at the Prima Facie Stage In Malaysian criminal procedure, the boundary between the prosecution stage and the defense stage is rigid. A critical question often arises in trials involving mental health: Can a trial judge acquit an accused person at the close of the prosecution's case if medical evidence strongly suggests the accused was of unsound mind during the offense? The Federal Court and Court of Appeal have definitively answered no . Evaluating a statutory defense before calling for the defense is a serious error of law. The Binding Precedents: Mohd Rozani and Pang Kar Foong The legal position was firmly clarified by the apex court in PP v. Mohd Rozani Yahaya [2025] 1 MLRA 203 , and subsequently reinforced by the Court of Appeal in Pendakwa Raya v Pang Kar Foong [2026] 4 MLRA 23 . In Pang Kar Foong , the Court of Appeal explicitly noted its binding obligation to follow the Federal Court’s ruling, overtu...
Read more

Case Analysis: Sivarasa Rasiah v Badan Peguam Malaysia & Anor — Political Office and the Independence of the Malaysian Bar

Case Analysis: Sivarasa Rasiah v Badan Peguam Malaysia & Anor — Political Office and the Independence of the Malaysian Bar Introduction The intersection of constitutional liberties and statutory regulations often creates significant legal debates in Malaysia. A landmark case addressing this dynamic is Sivarasa Rasiah v Badan Peguam Malaysia & Anor . This Court of Appeal decision clarifies the boundaries of the freedom of association under the Federal Constitution, specifically concerning the governance of professional bodies. Case Background The appellant, Sivarasa Rasiah, was a practicing advocate and solicitor in Malaysia. Following his election as the vice-president of a political party, he faced disqualification from serving as a member of the Bar Council. The disqualification was enforced under Section 46A(1)(c)(ii) of the Legal Profession Act 1976 (LPA) . This specific provision strictly prohibits individuals who hold office in a political party from being elected as memb...
Read more

STRATA MANAGEMENT: TRIBUNAL IS NOT A COURT

Why Strata Management Tribunal Awards Do Not Trigger Res Judicata: Court of Appeal Clarifies A common misconception among property owners and management bodies in Malaysia is that the Strata Management Tribunal (SMT) functions exactly like a traditional civil court. Many believe that once the SMT delivers an award, the dispute is permanently locked under the legal doctrine of res judicata (which prevents the same parties from litigating the same issue twice). However, a landmark decision by the Court of Appeal has completely dismantled this assumption. In the case of Yong Kein Sin & Anor v Perbadanan Pengurusan Springtide Residences and other appeals , the Court of Appeal ruled that SMT awards do not automatically attract the application of res judicata . 1. The Legal Status: An SMT is an Inferior Tribunal, Not a Court The foundation of the Court of Appeal’s ruling rests on how the law defines an adjudicating body. Under Section 3 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 and Section ...
Read more