Skip to main content

Posts

Going to Court in Malaysia: What is "Discovery" and How Does It Work?

Going to Court in Malaysia: What is "Discovery" and How Does It Work? Are you facing a court case in Malaysia? If so, you might hear your lawyer talk about a process called discovery . Discovery is a legal tool. It lets you ask the other side to show you their documents before the trial starts. A recent Malaysian High Court case ( Saville @ Cheras v Dato Yasmeen ) reminds us that you cannot just ask for any document you want. The court has very strict rules to keep the process fair. Here is what you need to know about getting documents for your case. The Golden Rule: It Must Be Necessary Many people think they can ask for any document that seems useful or interesting. The High Court made it clear that this is not true. The court will only order the other side to give you documents if it is absolutely necessary . Necessary means the case cannot be resolved fairly without it. It also means the document will help save time and court costs. Useful or nice to have is not enoug...
Read more
Recent posts

How to Get Paid in Malaysian Construction Disputes: The Power of Section 30 CIPAA

How to Get Paid in Malaysian Construction Disputes: The Power of Section 30 CIPAA Winning a construction adjudication case under CIPAA is a major victory. But a decision on paper does not always mean cash in the bank. If the contractor you sued refuses to pay, you do not have to wait indefinitely. A recent landmark ruling by the Court of Appeal in Tri Pacific Engineering Sdn Bhd v. KL Eco City Sdn Bhd [2026] confirms a powerful legal shortcut. You can demand payment directly from the project owner (the Principal). Here is how subcontractors and consultants can use Section 30 of CIPAA to recover their hard-earned money. What is Section 30 of CIPAA? Section 30 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act (CIPAA) 2012 acts as a legal safety net. If the party who lost the adjudication fails to pay you, the law allows you to bypass them entirely. You can compel the top-tier project owner or developer to pay you directly from the funds they hold. The 4 Conditions to Force Direc...
Read more

The date you pay your booking fee is the start date for late delivery compensation

The date you pay your booking fee is the start date for late delivery compensation. The High Court in Malaysia recently confirmed this rule in a 2026 case called Sinerjuta Sdn Bhd v. Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah [19]. This decision is a major win for home buyers who face long delays from housing developers. Why This Case Matters to You Bigger Payouts : You get more money because the clock starts ticking earlier. No Developer Tricks : Developers cannot shift dates to avoid penalties. Protects Buyers : The law protects your rights as a consumer. The Core Dispute A housing developer tried to argue that the 36-month countdown for handing over keys should start only when the official Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) is signed. They claimed the booking fee was just a temporary step. The High Court rejected the developer's arguments. The judge ruled that a binding contract is made the exact moment you pay the booking fee. The formal SPA document is just a final detail. What this Mean...
Read more

Joint tortfeasors (multiple defendants sued for the same wrong) are jointly liable for a single defamation award under Malaysian law

Joint tortfeasors (multiple defendants sued for the same wrong) are jointly liable for a single defamation award under Malaysian law, meaning a court cannot split the damages into separate penalties for each defendant. Understanding Joint Liability in Malaysian Defamation Law When multiple parties publish or spread a defamatory statement together, Malaysian courts treat them as a single legal entity for damages. Here is how the landmark cases of Chee Kuat Fong [2008] and Liew Yew Tiam [2001] impact your legal strategy: One Single Award: The Court of Appeal confirms that trial courts err if they divide financial penalties among joint defendants. The Global Sum Principle: The court assesses the total harm caused to your reputation and awards one lump sum. Enforcement Flexibility: As a plaintiff, you can collect the entire awarded sum from any single defendant or all of them combined. High Threshold for Appeals: Higher courts will not change a defamation award unless the total sum i...
Read more

How to Protect Your Property in a Corporate Dispute: Understanding Injunctions in Malaysia

How to Protect Your Property in a Corporate Dispute: Understanding Injunctions in Malaysia When a business dispute arises, your assets, property, or company shares could be at risk before the case even goes to trial. In Malaysia, you can protect these assets by applying for an interlocutory injunction. This court order temporarily freezes or preserves property until the court reaches a final decision. A key case on this issue is See Teow Guan v Liquidators of Kian Joo Holdings Sdn Bhd [2008] . In this case, the Court of Appeal clarified exactly what you must prove to secure this vital legal protection. The Six Legal Requirements for Property Preservation Malaysian courts follow established principles to decide if your property deserves urgent protection. To win an injunction, your legal team must satisfy these six requirements: A Serious Question to be Tried : You must show your lawsuit has merit and is not frivolous. No Unreasonable Delay : You must apply for the order quickly after d...
Read more

Proving Your Professional Negligence Case in Malaysia: The Limits of Liability

Proving Your Professional Negligence Case in Malaysia: The Limits of Liability When a business transaction collapses due to an inaccurate professional valuation, identifying who you can legally hold accountable is critical to recovering your financial losses. Under Malaysian tort law, you cannot automatically sue a professional just because their advice caused you financial harm. The Legal Reality: The Co-operative Central Bank Precedent In the landmark Federal Court case The Co-operative Central Bank Limited v KGV & Associates Sdn Bhd , a financier attempted to sue a registered property valuer for negligence. The court ruled that the valuer did not owe a duty of care to the financier. This judgment established a crucial boundary for professional liability in Malaysia based on three core commercial legal principles: No Direct Relationship: The valuer had no direct contractual link or communication with the financier. Lack of Knowledge: The professional was unaware of the specific...
Read more