Skip to main content

Striking out: procedure

Understanding Mortgagee Rights: Bank of China v Ngan Ching Wen

Can a borrower sue a bank for selling charged shares at the wrong time? A key decision by the High Court clarifies the scope of a lender's duty of care during debt recovery and how courts handle minor procedural objections.
The Background of the Case
In Bank of China v Ngan Ching Wen, the plaintiff (the bank) sought to strike out the defendant's counterclaim. The dispute arose after the bank sold charged shares to recover an outstanding debt.
The defendant argued that the bank owed a duty of care to sell the shares when market conditions were optimal. However, the defendant failed to specify the dates when the sale should have happened or provide evidence of the shares' market value at that time.
Key Legal Takeaways
1. No Duty of Care on Timing of Sale
The High Court reaffirmed a fundamental principle of banking and commercial law: a mortgagee or chargee owes no duty of care to the borrower regarding the timing of a sale.
  • Contractual Rights: The terms of the memorandum of charge gave the bank the absolute contractual right to decide when to liquidate the security.
  • Lender Protection: Courts will uphold clear contractual agreements that allow financial institutions to recover debts without being liable for market fluctuations.
2. Substance Over Technicality in Court Rules
The defendant also raised a preliminary objection, claiming the bank's striking-out application was defective. The issue was the technical use of the word "and" between limbs (a) and (b) of Order 18 Rule 19 of the Rules of the High Court (RHC).
The Court dismissed this technical objection based on Order 1A of the RHC, which mandates that:
  • Courts must focus on the justice of the case.
  • Technical compliance with procedural rules cannot override substantive fairness.
Why This Matters for Legal Practitioners
This case is a vital reminder for litigators and financial institutions. When drafting striking-out applications, minor typographical or procedural errors will not automatically defeat an action if the substantive merits are strong. More importantly, it solidifies the protection lenders enjoy when exercising their rights over charged assets.

Popular posts from this blog

What are the available remedies to a purchaser when he is given a defective house out of time by the seller developer?

Late Delivery and Defective Housing: Your Legal Remedies as a Malaysian Homebuyer Buying a home is one of the most significant financial investments you will ever make in Malaysia. It can be incredibly frustrating when a housing developer delivers your property late, only for you to find it riddled with construction defects. If you are facing this situation, you have clear legal protections under Malaysian law. Here is a breakdown of the remedies available to Malaysian homebuyers when a developer delivers a defective house past the agreed deadline. 1. Compensation for Construction Defects When a developer delivers a house with defects (such as cracked walls, leaking pipes, or poor workmanship), they are legally obligated to fix them or compensate you under the standard Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) prescribed by the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA) . In the landmark case of LSSC Development Sdn Bhd v Thomas Iruthayam & Anor [2007] , the Court of Appeal...
Read more

CRIMINAL LAW: After having found prosecution has established a prima facie case, trial Judge has to call accused to enter his defence

Legal Update: Why Malaysian Courts Cannot Evaluate the Insanity Defense at the Prima Facie Stage In Malaysian criminal procedure, the boundary between the prosecution stage and the defense stage is rigid. A critical question often arises in trials involving mental health: Can a trial judge acquit an accused person at the close of the prosecution's case if medical evidence strongly suggests the accused was of unsound mind during the offense? The Federal Court and Court of Appeal have definitively answered no . Evaluating a statutory defense before calling for the defense is a serious error of law. The Binding Precedents: Mohd Rozani and Pang Kar Foong The legal position was firmly clarified by the apex court in PP v. Mohd Rozani Yahaya [2025] 1 MLRA 203 , and subsequently reinforced by the Court of Appeal in Pendakwa Raya v Pang Kar Foong [2026] 4 MLRA 23 . In Pang Kar Foong , the Court of Appeal explicitly noted its binding obligation to follow the Federal Court’s ruling, overtu...
Read more

Check out this exciting new young author

Introducing an emerging literary talent whose work is already making waves in the world of contemporary storytelling. This young author captivates readers with a unique voice, vivid imagination, and a gift for crafting narratives that are both engaging and thought-provoking. Blending creativity with emotional depth, her stories explore themes that resonate across diverse audiences, leaving a lasting impression with each piece. Her growing portfolio showcases a range of genres and styles, revealing a versatility and commitment to the craft that is rare among new writers. With a steadily expanding presence and a passion for connecting with readers, this promising author is one to watch as she continues to refine her artistry and make her mark on the literary landscape: https://themochastories.wordpress.com/2024/04/28/the-ad/ https://themochastories.blogspot.com/ https://themochastories.wixsite.com/mocha
Read more