Skip to main content

List of reported and unreported cases: MLJ

 YONG KOK YEAP & ANOR v URUSWAJAR CONCRETE SDN BHD [2026] MLJU 673

 

THEYAKARAJA A/L PALANIANDY v MAJLIS PEGUAM & ANOR [2024] MLJU 1470

 

LIM MEI JIN (SUING AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF LOH YUEN WENG (DECEASED) (APPOINTED AS THE EXECUTRIX AND TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF LOH YUEN WENG (DECEASED)) & ANOR v LOH YUEN TUCK [2025] MLJU 478

 

SHRI @ INDRAN RAM A/L RAMASAMY v MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA [2022] MLJU 3019

 

KIM LAM HUAT BUILDERS SDN BHD v ANG KUAH CHUA DAN SATU LAGI [2021] MLJU 210

 

SHIKOH ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD v URUSWAJAR CONCRETE SDN BHD [2019] MLJU 1723

 

LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN RAZAK & ANOR AND ANOTHER APPEAL [2018] 1 MLJ 503

 

LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN ABDUL RAZAK [2017] MLJU 1330

 

TRIP GUARD SDN BHD v IMMANUEL CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD [2017] MLJU 1138


LOGICAL OPERATIONS CONSORTIUM SDN BHD v ABDUL RAHIM BIN RAZAK DAN SATU LAGI [2016] MLJU 1907

 

SYARIKAT BEKALAN AIR SELANGOR SDN BHD v FADHA NUR BT AHMAD KAMAR & ANOR [2012] 7 MLJ 657 | [2011] MLJU 536

 

DATO SOO LAI SING v KUMPULAN SIERRAMAS (M) SDN BHD [2004] 3 MLJ 546

 

FACB BERHAD v HO SEE SIN & OTHERS [2003] MLJU 450

 

TRANSTEL TECHNOLOGY (M) SDN BHD v NATSEVEN TV SDN BHD [2003] MLJU 238

 

AZRAHI HOTELS SDN BHD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIRTUAL AMBER SDN BHD); ADVANCE HOTELS SUPPLIES (M) SDN BHD & ANOR, SUPPORTING CREDITORS v AZRAHI HOTELS SDN BHD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VIRTUAL AMBER SDN BHD); ADVANCE HOTELS SUPPLIES (M) SDN BHD & ANOR, SUPPORTING CREDITORS [2003] 5 MLJ 503

 

CELCOM (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD v INMISS COMMUNICATION SDN. BHD. [2003] MLJ 178

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN BHD v BELL & ORDER BHD [2002] 3 MLJ 321

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [2002] 2 MLJ 506

 

AJE BEST-ON SDN BHD v AHMAD BIN OMAR & ANOR [2000] 4 MLJ 600

 

ANTARA ELEKTRIK SDN BHD v BELL & ORDER BHD [2000] 6 MLJ 385

 

ANN JOO METAL SDN BHD v PEMBENAAN MY CHAHAYA SDN BHD [2000] 5 MLJ 708

 

DMCD MUSEUMN ASSOCIATES SDN. BHD. v SHADEMAKER (M) SDN. BHD. [1998] MLJU 364

 

MALACCA SECURITIES SDN BHD v LOKE YU [1999] 6 MLJ 112

 

LAI SING KEJURUTERAAN (M) SDN BHD v TEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD [1997] MLJU 197

Popular posts from this blog

Law updates - General (Malaysian law unless otherwise stated)

*Abbreviations   HC = high court  COA = court of appeal  FC = federal court   Ngu Toh Tung & 7 Ors v Superintendent of Lands & Survey, Kuching Division, Kuching & Anor [COA] administrative law; land acquisition J & C New Poly Catering Sdn Bhd v TTMP Bakun Consortium Sdn Bhd [HC] The general rule is that a high court will not issue an injunction to restrain the execution of another high court order. However, the high court possesses inherent jurisdiction to do justice in each case. Thus, an interim injunction could be issued to restrain execution of a decree if it could be shown that the execution would result in an injury to the party against whom the execution was directed at. As a matter of practice, applications for a garnishee order are made before the sar or dr and the decision is appealable to a judge in chambers. Even though under the rules of the high court 1980, service of originating process or other court documents on a corporation...
Read more

Probate & Administration; Tort; Civil Procedure: Case Updates

Ong Thye Peng v Loo Choo Teng & 7 Ors [2008] 1 AMR 757 [FC] Section 60 of the Probate and Administration Act, 1959 ("the Act") is concerned with the manner of disposal of the property of a deceased person by his personal representative. An executor is a trustee of the property of the beneficiaries just as an administrator is. Their duty was to ensure that the estate, of which they are trustees, benefits as much as possible when they deal with trust property. Thus, the obligation of executors and administrators towards the estate of which they are personal representatives must be the same because their primary duty was to protect the rights and interests of the beneficiaries. There can therefore be no difference in the duty of administrators and executors in the sale of estate property. It followed that even in the case of a sale of property by an executor, the relevant date to determine whether the price for the property is fair is not at the time of the offer but at t...
Read more

What are the available remedies to a purchaser when he is given a defective house out of time by the seller developer?

In LSSC Development Sdn Bhd v Thomas Iruthayam & Anor [2007] 2 CLJ 434, the Court of Appeal held that where purchasers were given a defective house out of time by the developer, for the defects, that was something for which they were entitled to be compensated. As for the delay in delivery, the contract itself contained a clause which provided the formula for the compensation that the developer must pay for its lateness. This was the clause to which the purchasers have recourse as it created a contractual obligation to pay a single sum by way of liquidated damages for the period during which they were kept out of the building for which they had already paid, such sum being calculated upon the basis set out in the sale and purchase agreement.
Read more