Sunday, 20 December 2015

Malaysia-effect of rescission of a sale and purchase agreement on an assignment

In the Federal Court case of RHB Bank Bhd v Travelsight (M) Sdn Bhd (No Syarikat: 50037-A) & Ors and another appeal [2014] MLJU 1467, it was held that:-

"...[1] The questions upon which leave was granted to RHB Bank Berhad to appeal in Civil Appeal 02-36-2013(W), and to Atlas Corporation Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) and liquidators, namely Taufiq Ahmad @ Ahmad Mustapha bin Ghazali and Mak Kam Choon to appeal in Civil Appeal 02-38-2013(W), against the order of the Court of Appeal in respect of the matter decided by the High Court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, read:


RAYUAN SIVIL NO: 02(F)-36-07/2013(W)

  •  
    1. Sama ada penyerahanhak (assignment) ke semua hak, hak milik dan manfaat di dalam perjanjian jual beli tidak akan (lagi) berkesan selepas (setelah) suatu perintah bagi pembatalan perjanjian jual beli itu? 
  •  
    2. ama ada bank yang menerima suatu penyerahanhak perjanjian jual beli yang telah dibatalkan oleh suatu perintah bagi pembatalan mempunyai apa-apa hak atau obligasi kontrak untuk menyerah hak semula.Sama ada satu penerima bank (receipient bank) di bawah perjanjian jual beli yang telah dibatalkan (rescinded) oleh suatu Perintah Pembatalan (Order for Rescission) mempunyai apa-apa hak di bawah kontrak atau obligasi (contractual right or obligation) untuk menyerah hak semula (reassign); 
  •  
    Sama ada satu penerima bank (receipient bank) di bawah perjanjian jual beli yang telah dibatalkan (rescinded) oleh suatu Perintah Pembatalan (Order for Rescission) mempunyai apa-apa hak di bawah kontrak atau obligasi (contractual right or obligation) untuk menyerah hak semula (reassign); 
  • (i)
    hartanah itu (subject perjanjian jual beli itu) dan/atau; 
  • (ii)
    harta (hal perkara perjanjian jual beli); 
  • (iii)
    hak-hak milik dan manfaat di dalam perjanjian jual beli kepada pemberi serahanhak (assignee)/peminjam selepas pembayaran penuh pinjaman (loan). 

RAYUAN SIVIL NO: 02(F)-38-07/2013(W)

  • 1
    Whether an assignment of all rights, title and benefit of a sale and purchase agreement would be ineffective upon the order for the rescission of the sale and purchase agreement? 
  • 2
    Whether a recipient bank of an assignment of a sale and purchase agreement that has been rescinded by an order for rescission has any contractual right or obligation to reassign; 
  • (i)
    the property (the subject matter of the sale and purchase agreement); and/or 
  • (ii)
    the rights, title and benefit in and to the sale and purchase agreement, to the assignor/borrower upon full payment of the loan? 
....[35] We now answer the leave questions in English, which also answer the leave questions in Bahasa Malaysia, as follows:

Question 1:
An assignment of the rights, title and benefit of a sale and purchase agreement is between a purchaser/borrower and a bank, whilst the rescission of a sale and purchase agreement is between purchaser and vendor.
The assignment is the security of the bank. But that security of the bank will be lost upon a valid rescission of the sale and purchase agreement. The security may be lost. But the assignment remains, and the bank is nonetheless the assignee of the rights that will accrue to the borrower upon rescission of the sale and purchase agreement. Hence, while the order of rescission will affect the security of the bank, it will not affect the assignment nor the standing of the bank as assignee and or creditor of the borrower, or the equitable right of the bank to lay first claim to the money or property to be restituted, to discharge the outstanding loan.
Question 2:
In the instant case, where both borrower and bank had agreed to relinquish the property and what would be restituted was a refund of money, it would be unreasonable to hold the bank to reassign property. After rescission, Travelsight could not rely on the sale and purchase agreement to give it a clear title to the property, such that Travelsight could not rely on the assignment to give it that clear title (for an analogy, see Independent Trustee Services Ltd v GP Noble Trustees Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 195 at [52]). At most, the bank could only be held to assign the proprietary right to the refund and or the rights for enforcing the same."

Malaysia-any person, whether a Chief Minister, Minister or Prime Minister may maintain an action for defamation in his personal capacity, but not in his official capacity

In Dewan Perniagaan Melayu Malaysia Negeri Johor v Menteri Besar Johor & Ors [2015] MLJU 1144, it was held that:-

"...Due to strong public interest considerations, any person, whether a Chief Minister, Minister or Prime Minister may maintain an action for defamation in his personal capacity, but not in his official capacity. To allow such person - for instance the second plaintiff as Terengganu Menteri Besar in the instant case - would intimidate members of the public and strike fear in them, thereby stifling or discouraging constructive public criticism where such criticism is necessary for the public good. Any threat of civil action for libel by a Chief Minister or any other Minster, in an official capacity, would have a "chilling effect" and be detrimental to the constitutional right of freedom of speech in a civil and progressive society.."

Malaysia-Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015

Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015






​__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Circular No 272/2015
Dated 17 Dec 2015

To Members of the Malaysian Bar
Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015
Garis Panduan, Pindaan Kod, Pengkelasan Kod Tambahan dan Format Statistik bagi Kes-Kes di bawah
Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007 [Akta 670]
The Chief Registrar of the Federal Court of Malaysia, Dato' Roslan b Haji Abu Bakar, has extended to us a copy of Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015 dated 14 Dec 2015 pertaining to guidelines, code amendments, classification of additional codes, and the format for statistics in respect of cases under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 [Act 670].
Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015 includes guidelines for Judges of the Sessions Courts and Magistrates' Courts in respect of such cases, entitled "Garis Panduan bagi Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen / Majistret dalam Kes-Kes Pemerdagangan Orang di bawah Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007 ("Garis Panduan").
Please be informed that Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015 will take effect from 1 Jan 2016 (Friday).
The relevant portion of Arahan Amalan Bil 6 Tahun 2015 is reproduced below, and a copy of it (including the Garis Panduan) is available online here for your reference.
Thank you.
Karen Cheah Yee Lynn
Secretary
Malaysian Bar

___________________________________________________________________________

Tarikh: 14 Disember 2015
ARAHAN AMALAN BIL. 6 TAHUN 2015
GARIS PANDUAN, PINDAAN KOD, PENGKELASAN KOD TAMBAHAN DAN FORMAT STATISTIK BAGI KES-KES DI BAWAH AKTA
ANTIPEMERDAGANGAN ORANG DAN ANTIPENYELUDUPAN MIGRAN 2007 [AKTA 670]
Dengan hormatnya saya merujuk perkara di atas.
2. Adalah dimaklumkan bahawa pada masa ini kes-kes berkaitan Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007 [Akta 670] telah diberikan perhatian serius oleh semua pihak dan seringkali menjadi isu perbahasan dalam persidangan di Parlimen.
3. Selain dari itu, Pejabat Ketua Pendaftar Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia juga telah dilantik untuk menganggotai beberapa jawatankuasa di bawah Majlis Anti Pemerdagangan Orang dan Penyeludupan Migran (MAPO) seperti High Level Committee (HLC) Mengenai Pemerdagangan Orang dan Jawatankuasa Pengurusan Kes yang antara lain bertujuan untuk memantau kes-kes di bawah Akta 670 yang tertangguh melebihi tiga (3) bulan di rumah-rumah perlindungan.
4. Oleh yang demikian, untuk tujuan penyelarasan dan pemantauan, arahan amalan ini dikeluarkan dan hendaklah dipatuhi oleh pegawai-pegawai yang terlibat.
5. GARIS PANDUAN
5.1 Bagi tujuan penyeragaman dan penjelasan lanjut mengenai pengendalian kes-kes di bawah Akta 670 yang melibatkan Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen dan Majistret, bersama-sama ini dilampirkan "Garis Panduan Bagi Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen / Majistret Dalam Kes-Kes Pemerdagangan Orang di bawah Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007 [Akta 670]".
5.2 Sehubungan dengan itu, "Garis Panduan Bagi Majistret Di Bawah Akta Anti Pemerdagangan Orang 2007" yang dikeluarkan melalui surat Ketua Pendaftar bertarikh 3 September 2008 adalah dibatalkan.
6. PINDAAN KOD DAN PENGKELASAN KOD TAMBAHAN
6.1 Bagi Mahkamah Sesyen, Kod 61ATIPSOM dan Kod 62ATIPSOM dipinda seperti berikut:
Kod 61SOM Kes Tangkap Penyeludupan Migran di bawah Akta 670 – Pekhidmat Awam
Nota: Kes-kes di bawah seksyen 26A, 26B, 26C, 26D, 26E, 26F, 26G, 26H, 26I, 26J, 26K
Kod 62SOM Kes Tangkap Penyeludupan Migran di bawah Akta 670
Nota: Kes-kes di bawah seksyen 26A, 26B, 26C, 26D, 26E, 26F, 26G, 26H, 26I, 26J, 26K
Kod 61ATIP Kes Tangkap Pemerdagangan Orang di bawah Akta 670 – Pekhidmat Awam
Kod 62ATIP Kes Tangkap Pemerdagangan Orang di bawah Akta 670
6.2 Kod 61ATP dan 62ATP yang terpakai sebelum ini adalah terbatal. Walau bagaimanapun, bagi kes-kes sedia ada yang telah didaftarkan dengan kod 61ATP dan 62ATP hendaklah dikekalkan sehingga kes-kes tersebut selesai. Pendaftaran kes-kes mengikut kod-kod yang baru hendaklah terpakai mulai arahan amalan ini berkuatkuasa.
6.3 Bagi Mahkamah Majistret, pengkelasan kod tambahan adalah seperti berikut:
Kod 89ATP (A) Permohonan Perintah Perlindungan Sementara
[Interim Protection Order (IPO)]
Kod 89ATP (B) Permohonan Perintah Perlindungan
[Protection Order (PO)]
Nota: Permohonan PO perlu didaftarkan semula dan diberikan nombor kes baru sekiranya ia merupakan lanjutan daripada permohonan IPO.
6.4 Buku kausa khas bagi setiap kod terpinda di perenggan 6.1 dan kod tambahan di perenggan 6.3 hendaklah diwujudkan dan diselenggara dengan teratur.
7. FORMAT STATISTIK
7.1 Bagi kemudahan pengumpulan statistik kod tambahan di perenggan 6.3, format statistik bulanan seperti di Lampiran A dan Lampiran B hendaklah digunakan.
7.2 Jenis eksploitasi dan agensi penguatkuasa yang dirujuk di dalam format statistik tersebut adalah sebagaimana berikut:
Jenis Eksploitasi
  1. Seksual (SEX)
  2. Kerja Paksa (Force Labour) (E)
  3. Hamba/Abdi (SS)
  4. Pemindahan Organ (O)
  5. Lain-lain (Ors.)
Agensi Penguatkuasa
  1. Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM)
  2. Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia (IMI)
  3. Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia (KDRM)
  4. Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia (APMM)
  5. Jabatan Tenaga Kerja (JTK)
8. Arahan Amalan ini berkuat kuasa mulai 1 Januari 2016.
This circular may also be accessed here.






--
-- 

Malaysia-Talk : 'Laws Relating To Strata Management'

Talk : 'Laws Relating To Strata Management'
To:


SBC/CIR/096/2015
09th December, 2015 

  
Brochure/Form [Download PDF]

Online Registration Link [URL Link]


Thank you.

Secretariat
Selangor Bar Committee.






































--

Paintglow Venue Relocated

Paintglow Venue Relocated






***ANNOUNCEMENT*** PAINTGLOW FESTIVAL 2015 has been RELOCATED to SEPANG SIC-WELCOME CENTRE. The changes is due to Bukit Jalil Stadium is going to
ticketpro header 1

***ANNOUNCEMENT***

PAINTGLOW FESTIVAL 2015 has been
RELOCATED
to
SEPANG SIC-WELCOME CENTRE.
The changes is due to Bukit Jalil Stadium is going to be RENOVATED for SEA GAMES. SAME TICKETS can be used for entry.
SINCERE APOLOGIES
from
BUKIT JALIL STADIUM & PGF
for the inconvenienced caused.
multi 2
Visit OFFICIAL Paintglow Festival Webpage for further info.
Visit Paintglow Festival Facebook Page for constant updates.

Grab your tickets now at

TicketPro Malaysia

Ticket Hotline : 03-7880 7999

facebook
1px
©2015 Ticketpro Malaysia Sdn Bhd | Ticketpro Malaysia Sdn Bhd, D-2-03A,Jalan SS6/20A Dataran Glomac, Kelana Jaya 47301 Petaling Jaya Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
1px
Web Version   Preferences   Forward   Unsubscribe  
 



--

Malaysia-Talk : 'Criminal Law In Practice'

Talk : 'Criminal Law In Practice'
To:


SBC/CIR/098/2015
09th December, 2015 
* Take Note Change of Time 
    
Brochure/Form [Download PDF]

Online Registration Link [URL Link]


Thank you.

Secretariat
Selangor Bar Committee.











































--

Malaysia-Practising without a Practising Certificate after 31 Dec 2015

Practising without a Practising Certificate after 31 Dec 2015





__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Circular No 273/2015
Dated 18 Dec 2015

To Members of the Malaysian Bar

Practising without a Practising Certificate after 31 Dec 2015

Pursuant to part III of the Legal Profession Act 1976 ("LPA"), Practising Certificate and Sijil Annual shall be renewed annually by every advocate and solicitor.

(A)    Application for Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate 2016

We refer to Circular No 197/2015 dated 9 Sept 2015, containing information relating to the application for Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate ("SA/PC") 2016.

Members who wish to continue their practice but have yet to submit their SA/PC 2016 applications are reminded to take immediate steps to forward their duly completed applications to the Bar Council Secretariat.

Members who have been notified that their SA/PC 2016 applications are not in order are advised to regularise their applications on an urgent basis by providing the information or documents requested, to enable the Bar Council Secretariat to complete the processing of their applications in good time.

(B)    Practising after 31 Dec 2015

Members who have yet to receive their Practising Certificates 2016 are advised to take note of section 29(3) of the LPA, which provides that if a Member has duly complied with section 29(1) of the LPA (relating to the application for Practising Certificates) "in the month of January of any year, the practising certificate issued to him in respect of that year shall be deemed to have been in operation from the 1st day of January of that year".

Members may appear in court and carry on with their law practice in January 2016 even if they have not received their Practising Certificates 2016, provided they comply with section 29(3) of the LPA.

The status of a Member who was in possession of a valid SA/PC 2015 but who is not issued with a valid SA/PC 2016 by 31 Jan 2016 will be changed from "active" to "inactive" in the Bar Council's database on 1 Feb 2016.
 
(C)    Cessation of Practice

Members who wish to cease practice, either on a permanent or temporary basis, are required to notify the Bar Council in accordance with section 31(2) of the LPA, and to comply with the Bar Council's Rules on Cessation of, or Change in, Practice ("Rules").

A copy of the Rules and the relevant forms can be obtained from the Bar Council Secretariat or downloaded from the Malaysian Bar website (please refer to the "Membership" section under the Resources>Frequently Used Forms tab).  

A Member will not be deemed to have ceased practice merely as a result of the expiration of the validity of the Member's Practising Certificate 2015 on 31 Dec 2015 pursuant to section 29(2) of the LPA.

(D)    Disciplinary Proceedings

The Bar Council will institute disciplinary proceedings after 31 Jan 2016 against Members who have not been issued with SA/PC 2016 by 31 Jan 2016, except in respect of Members from whom the Bar Council has received a Notice of Cessation of Practice as an Advocate and Solicitor, supported with a Statutory Declaration as prescribed under the Rules.

For sole proprietors who do not have a valid Sijil Annual and Practising Certificate 2016 and have not ceased practice, site inspections will be conducted and injunction proceedings will be instituted against sole proprietors whose firms are found to be in operation.  In the event that the Bar Council institutes injunction proceedings against a Member, any costs incurred by the Bar Council shall be borne by the Member concerned.

(E)    Contact Us for Assistance

For enquiries relating to your SA/PC 2016 application, kindly contact the Membership Department by telephone at 03-2050 2191, or send an email to membership@malaysianbar.org.my.


Thank you.


Karen Cheah Yee Lynn
Secretary
Malaysian Bar


This circular may also be accessed here.

--
-- 

Malaysia-Arahan Pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim / Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Bil 3/2015

Arahan Pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim / Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Bil 3/2015





___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Circular No 274/2015
Dated 18 Dec 2015

To Members of the Malaysian Bar

Arahan Pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim / Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Bil 3/2015

The Chief Judge of Malaya, YAA Tan Sri Dato' Seri Zulkefli b Ahmad Makinudin, has extended to us a copy of Arahan Pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim / Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Bil 3/2015, dated 7 Dec 2015 regarding the placement of Honourable High Court Judges and Judicial Commissioners.

Please be informed that the transfer will take effect on 1 Jan 2016 (Friday).

The relevant portion of Arahan Pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim / Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Bil 3/2015 is reproduced below.
Thank you.

Karen Cheah Yee Lynn
Secretary
Malaysian Bar

__________________________________________________________________________

Tarikh: 7 Disember 2015

ARAHAN PERTUKARAN YANG ARIF HAKIM/PESURUHJAYA KEHAKIMAN MAHKAMAH TINGGI BIL. 3/2015
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adalah saya dengan segala hormatnya merujuk kepada perkara di atas dan memaklumkan bahawa pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim/Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi berikut diluluskan dan berkuatkuasa pada 1 Januari 2016:

Bil.                Nama             Dari            Ke
1. YA Datuk Siti Mariah Binti Hj. Ahmad Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi (Bahagian Jenayah)
Kuala Lumpur
Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Keluarga)
Kuala Lumpur
2. YA Dato' Azman bin Husin Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Jenayah)
Kuala Lumpur
Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Jenayah)
Shah Alam
3. YA Dato' Haji Azman Bin Abdullah Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
Kota Bharu
Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Jenayah)
Kuala Lumpur
4. YA Puan Hadhariah bt. Syed Ismail Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Sivil)
Shah Alam
Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
Pulau Pinang
5. YA Dato' Hanipah Bt. Farikullah Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Sivil)
Shah Alam
Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Kuasa-Kuasa Khas)
Kuala Lumpur
6. YA Tuan Lee Swee Seng Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Keluarga)
Kuala Lumpur
Hakim
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Pembinaan)
Kuala Lumpur
7. YA Dato' Hj. Ab. Karim bin Hj. Ab. Rahman Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi Kuantan dan Temerloh
Pahang
Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman Mahkamah Tinggi (Bahagian Jenayah)
Kuala Lumpur
8. YA Dato' Nordin bin Hassan Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi
Pulau Pinang
Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Jenayah)
Kuala Lumpur
9. YA Puan Noorin binti Badaruddin Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi
Ipoh
Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Dagang)
Kuala Lumpur
10. YA Tuan Mohd Nazlan bin Mohd Ghazali Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi
Johor Bahru
Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman
Mahkamah Tinggi
(Bahagian Dagang)
Kuala Lumpur

2.    Pertukaran Yang Arif Hakim/Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman ini telah dipersetujui dan diluluskan oleh YAA Ketua Hakim Negara.

3.    Yang Arif-Yang Arif adalah dikehendaki menyelesaikan kes-kes sambung bicara sebelum kuatkuasanya arahan ini dan sekiranya tidak selesai, hendaklah mengemukakan kepada saya senarai kes-kes separuhbicara dengan menyatakan peringkat perbicaraan kes tersebut.

4.    Pegawai Pengurus Pusat Tanggungjawab yang terlibat adalah diarah mengemukakan Penyata Perubahan (Kew. 8) berkaitan dengan Arahan Pertukaran ini kepada pihak berkenaan.

This circular may also be accessed here


--
-- 

CLJ Bulletin #51/2015

CLJ Bulletin #51/2015





If you can't view the message, please click here.
18 December 2015, Issue #51/2015
Editors Note
Dear Reader,
Welcome to the latest CLJ Bulletin, Issue #51 of 2015. In this issue we provide you with highlights of selected cases from the Current Law Journal, Malaysia's leading authoritative reporter of case laws and judgments from the Courts of Malaysia and a selection of unreported cases from our widely cited Legal Network Series (LNS).
Among the items featured in this week's edition:

CASE(S) OF THE WEEK

PP lwn. MHS (SEORANG KANAK-KANAK) [2015] 2 SMC 123
MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET, KUALA PILAH
WAN NOR AKLIMA WAN SALLEH MJ
[KES TANGKAP NO: 83-88-05-14]
22 SEPTEMBER 2014
UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH
Akta Bahan-Bahan Kakisan dan Letupan dan Senjata Berbahaya 1958 - Seksyen 6(1) - Tertuduh didapati memiliki buluh dan parang di tempat awam - Tertuduh seorang kanak-kanak semasa kejadian dan berumur 18 tahun semasa dituduh - Pengakuan salah - Hukuman - Sama ada hukuman denda dikenakan - Sama ada perintah yang diberikan tertakluk kepada peruntukan s. 83(3) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 - Sama ada senjata-senjata yang dimiliki oleh tertuduh digunakan untuk menyebabkan kecederaan - Sama ada tertuduh mempunyai niat untuk melakukan jenayah - Sama ada tertuduh mempunyai masalah kesihatan - Sikap tertuduh - Laporan sosial - Sama ada dipertimbangkan - Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001, ss. 91(1)(d) & 93(1)(b)
PROSEDUR JENAYAH
Hukuman - Pesalah kanak-kanak - Akta Bahan-Bahan Kakisan dan Letupan dan Senjata Berbahaya 1958, s. 6(1) - Tertuduh seorang kanak-kanak semasa kejadian dan berumur 18 tahun semasa dituduh - Pengakuan salah - Sama ada hukuman denda dikenakan - Sama ada perintah yang diberikan tertakluk kepada peruntukan s. 83(3) Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001 - Sama ada senjata-senjata yang dimiliki oleh tertuduh digunakan untuk menyebabkan kecederaan - Sama ada tertuduh mempunyai niat untuk melakukan jenayah - Sama ada tertuduh mempunyai masalah kesihatan - Sikap tertuduh - Laporan sosial - Sama ada dipertimbangkan - Sama ada pertintah berbentuk bon sesuai diberikan terhadap tertuduh - Sama ada penjaga tertuduh dikehendaki melaksanakan bon berkelakuan baik - Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001, ss. 91(1)(d) & 93(1)(b) 
To view a sample of the Sessions and Magistrates' Cases journal, click here. For product enquiries, contact priority@cljlaw.com.


CLJ BOOK CATALOGUE

Book Catalogue
More >>

We hope this week's e-bulletin provides you with useful insights on the latest legal cases from the Courts of Malaysia.
We welcome your feedback & contribution. Please send your comments, suggestions and articles directly to cljln@cljlaw.com.
CLJ Bulletin: Copyright © 1997 - 2015 CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)
Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com | Telephone: 03-42705421(DL) 03-42705400(GL) | Fax: 03-42705402
To view previous issues of the CLJ Bulletin, click here.
If you no longer wish to receive this email in the future, you may unsubscribe.



--

Malaysia-Talk : 'Basic Accounting & Finance For Lawyers'

Talk : 'Basic Accounting & Finance For Lawyers'
To:


SBC/CIR/095/2015
09th December, 2015 
  
Brochure/Form [Download PDF]

Online Registration Link [URL Link]

Kindly view attachments for further clarification on the topic.

Thank you.

Secretariat
Selangor Bar Committee.







































--

Ad | Malaysian Civil Procedure 2015 (Thomson Reuters)

 Ad | Malaysian Civil Procedure 2015 (Thomson Reuters)





If this email does not display correctly, please click here to view the content online.
This is a paid advertisement.

PROMOTION

Get 12 Months FREE* access to Westlaw Asia for every purchase of one 
Malaysian Civil Procedure 2015 Bundle.
Enjoy this limited offer (until 31 December) and purchase today via easy credit card payment online.
Malaysian Civil Procedure 2015
Editor-in-Chief: Tun Arifin Zakaria
General Editor: Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram
e-ISBN: 978-967-0735-97-9
ISBN: 978-967-0735-90-0
Publishing: 2015
Format: Hardback / ProView™ eBook
Price: RM 1,769.60 (Print + eBook Bundle)

Drawing on the pedigree of the White Book which has seen numerous successful local editions in various common law jurisdictions, Malaysian Civil Procedure 2015 provides you with the most current knowledge, information, practical insights and confidence to succeed in all areas of civil court work.
Key Features:
  • Insightful order-by-order commentary presented clearly with succinct headings
  • Exacting quality and accuracy in true White Book tradition
  • Comprehensive survey of key local and relevant foreign case law
  • Contributors drawn from the judiciary, law firms and academia
  • Reviewed by experienced panel of reviewers


TO READ MORE, CLICK HERE.
Enjoy this limited offer (until 31 December) and purchase today via easy credit card payment online.
FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO ORDER
Call +603 5115 3000 - Email smamy.marketing@thomsonreuters.com
For more information about our legal products and solutions, please visit:
Sweet & Maxwell legal book titles: www.sweetandmaxwellasia.com.my
ProView: www.sweetandmaxwellasia.com.my/proview
Practical Law: global.practicallaw.com/regional-portal/asia
Westlaw Asia: www.westlawasia.com
Asian Legal Business: www.legalbusinessonline.com/asia
* Prices are valid in Malaysia, and inclusive of GST where applicable, and are subject to change without prior notice.

© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
This is a paid advertisement. If you would like to know more about Bar Council's advertising options, please contact us by email at advertise@malaysianbar.org.my.

--
-- 

Proview eBook Bi-Weekly Offer - Get your copy at 20% off!

Proview eBook Bi-Weekly Offer - Get your copy at 20% off! ...