Monday, 8 November 2010
Whether publication of defamatory words to staff of recipient or sender of de-famatory communication sufficient to constitute publication of defamatory words to third party
From: Selangor Bar <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 8 November 2010 08:19
Subject: Talk on ' Syariah Wills'
To: Selangor Bar <email@example.com>
8th November, 2010
Dear Members of the Bar,
The Selangor Bar Committee is organising a Talk on 'Syariah Wills' on 12th November, 2010 [Friday], 5.00 p.m at Selangor Bar Auditorium.
Selangor Bar Committee
This message has been scanned by TM antivirus for viruses and spyware and found to be clean.
[Malaysian Bar:2970] Press Release: Sarawak State Government’s continuing ban is detrimental to the development of human rights
From: Bar Council <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 4 November 2010 09:49
Subject: [Malaysian Bar:2970] Press Release: Sarawak State Government's continuing ban is detrimental to the development of human rights
The fact that a Commissioner of Malaysia's Human Rights Commission (Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia, or "SUHAKAM"), is denied entry into Sarawak is, in principle, quite wrong. There should not be any "no go" areas for SUHAKAM. The Federal Government, in exercising its rights under the Federal Constitution, has made a federal law to establish SUHAKAM and to define its terms of reference and scope of powers.
The entry ban is a negative development, and one that Malaysia can ill afford. It is happening at a time when SUHAKAM is once again coming under the scrutiny of the Sub-Committee on Accreditation of the International Coordinating Committee of National Human Rights Institutions. SUHAKAM's continuing "A" status is already in jeopardy, and the restrictions faced by Jannie Lasimbang may well kick SUHAKAM out of the "A" status league.
Malaysia is being closely observed by the international community for the manner in which the government is handling the issue of indigenous peoples' rights and land reform. Great focus has already been concentrated on Sarawak, what with the issue of the Penans, the illegal logging of native customary land, and other encroachment on the rights of the Orang Asal there.
As one of the four persons who constitute the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council, Jannie Lasimbang's proven expertise in the area of indigenous people's rights and land reform would have lent weight and credibility to the comprehensive national enquiry SUHAKAM was planning to undertake in this regard. The continued intransigence of the Sarawak State Government can only have a detrimental effect on the issue of Orang Asli/Orang Asal rights and on the orderly and positive development of human rights in our country.
Lim Chee Wee
4 November 2010
Proview eBook Bi-Weekly Offer - Get your copy at 20% off! ...
In the Court of Appeal case of Fujasa Property Sdn Bhd & Anor v Idaman Unggul Bhd & Anor  5 MLJ 810, it was held that:- &qu...
In Federal Furniture Industries Sdn Bhd v Chim Yiam Lee, Tan & Associates (Dahulunya dikenali sebagai Chim Yiam, Lee & Associates)(...
*Abbreviations HC = high court COA = court of appeal FC = federal court Ngu Toh Tung & 7 Ors v Superintendent of Lands & Sur...