APPEAL UPDATE
PP lwn. NA LIAN SENG
MAHKAMAH MAJISTRET, PETALING JAYA
MOHD HEZRI SHAHARIL Mj
[SAMAN NO: 85-01-12]
8 NOVEMBER 2013
[2014] 1 SMC 65
Nota Pengarang: Pihak pendakwaan telah merayu terhadap keputusan Yang Arif Majistret bertarikh 8 November 2013. Mahkamah Tinggi telah memutuskan agar kes ini dikembalikan ke Mahkamah Majistret supaya OKS memasukkan pembelaan. Bila kes dikembalikan semula ke Mahkamah Majistret, OKS, walau bagaimanapun, telah mengaku bersalah dan mahkamah menetapkan hukuman denda sebanyak RM1,500 jika gagal bayar penjara satu bulan.
 Dear Reader,
Welcome to the latest CLJ Bulletin, Issue #32 of 2015. In this issue we provide you with highlights of selected cases from the Current Law Journal, Malaysia's leading authoritative reporter of case laws and judgments from the Courts of Malaysia and a selection of unreported cases from our widely cited Legal Network Series (LNS).
Among the items featured in this week's edition: 
SURUHANJAYA PENCEGAHAN RASUAH MALAYSIA & ORS v. LATHEEFA BEEBI KOYA & ANOR
COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
LINTON ALBERT JCA, NALLINI PATHMANATHAN JCA, VERNON ONG LAM KIAT JCA
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-01-55-02-2013]
17 NOVEMBER 2014
CRIMINAL LAW
Corruption - Investigation - Lawyers accompanied client to Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission ('MACC') office to give statement - MACC requested to record statements by lawyers - MACC served notice requiring lawyers' presence for oral examination - Whether notices enforceable - Whether MACC had power to take statements or testimony of lawyers who appeared with client - Whether issuance of notice done in good faith - Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, ss. 16(b)(B), 30(1)(a), 30(3)(a), 46 & 72
WORDS & PHRASES
'person' - Meaning of - Whether includes both witness and suspect - Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, s. 30
WORDS & PHRASES
'in his opinion' - Meaning of - Whether an officer is given discretionary power in deciding whether to call any person - Whether an uncontrolled discretion - Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, s. 30(1)(a)
PP lwn. HAMDAN AHADLUDDIN [2015] 1 SMC 275 
MAHKAMAH SESYEN, PETALING JAYA
HAYATUL AKMAL ABDUL AZIZ HS
[KES TANGKAP NO: MS1-62JS-246-7-2013]
30 APRIL 2014
UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH
Kanun Keseksaan - Seksyen 375 & 376 - Rogol - Mangsa bawah umur - Keterangan tanpa sumpah - Sama ada diterima - Keterangan sokongan - Laporan perubatan - Keterangan bapa mangsa - Sama ada konsisten dengan keterangan mangsa - Sama ada tertuduh seorang saksi kredibel - Salinan laporan polis tertuduh - Kegagalan mengemukakan salinan asal - Sama ada peruntukan ss. 65 & 66 Akta Keterangan 1950 dipatuhi - Hukuman - Rekod sabitan lampau bagi kesalahan yang sama - Sama ada unsur kepentingan awam diambilkira - Akta Keterangan 1950, s. 133A
KETERANGAN
Keterangan dokumentar - Keterangan sekunder - Merogol mangsa bawah umur - Pembelaan - Salinan laporan polis tertuduh - Kegagalan mengemukakan salinan asal - Sama ada peruntukan ss. 65 & 66 Akta Keterangan 1950 dipatuhi
To view a sample of the Sessions and Magistrates' Cases journal, click here. For product enquiries, contact priority@cljlaw.com. |    
More >> |
